[llvm-dev] [RFC] RISC-V backend

[James Y Knight via llvm-dev]

That's extremely unfortunate. Our review systems make it way too easy for
reviews to fall through the cracks and get lost forever.

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault at amd.com>
wrote:

> On 08/17/2016 09:33 AM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote:
>
>>
>> I haven't actually been following the story of the AVR backend at all,
>> but afaik the current status is that there's a partially completed AVR
>> backend in trunk that's been under construction for a year or so, and a
>> functional backend in another repository, which people actually use.
>> However that situation came to pass, it seems a very unfortunate state to
>> be in, and it would be sad if this rewrite of the RISC-V backend ended up
>> with the upstream repository having the same mostly-unusable status for
>> RISC-V.
>>
>
> The problem is nobody is reviewing it. I've reviewed a number of patches,
> but the current set of ones up for review are for MC areas I'm not the best
> person for
>
> -Matt
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160817/7de8ef76/attachment.html>