[llvm-dev] The Trouble with Triples

[Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev]

> > I wouldn’t impose autoconf on anyone who has escaped it. As long as we have a route
> > to push this information into a build that is fine. Several CMAKE variables would do the
> > same thing. That change seems like a no-brainer and could potentially be done in parallel
> > to fixing how the information then goes on to flow through LLVM. (If autoconf based
> > builds are still alive in LLVM I could try and coach someone through how to do this in
> > autoconf but if it is dying in LLVM then let’s not feed it.)
> I can also coach them through. But yes, this is exactly what should happen.
If we want to support autoconf then I'll need some help. Personally, I'd prefer to ignore it and just do cmake.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150924/61b5c76c/attachment.html>