[LLVMdev] On LLD performance
ruiu at google.com
Fri Mar 20 14:42:54 PDT 2015
Your latest benchmark results look great. LLD took 1.38 seconds where gold
--threads takes 0.85 seconds. It needs to be faster, but that's not too bad.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's an update.
> > After http://reviews.llvm.org/D8372 , I updated the profiling data.
> > https://people.freebsd.org/~davide/llvm/lld-03162015.svg
> > It seems now 85% of CPU time is spent inside
> > FileArchive::buildTableOfContents().
> > In particular, 35% of the samples are spent inserting into
> > unordered_map, so there's maybe something we can do differently there
> > (e.g. , Rui's proposal of a concurrent map doesn't seem that bad).
> Why do we even need to build the table from name to member?
> Can't we just walk "archive->symbols()" and check for each symbol if
> it is needed by the current link status?
Are you suggesting we do linear search instead of hash table lookup each
time ArchiveFile::find(StringRef symbolName) is called?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev