[LLVMdev] [RFC] New StackMap format proposal (StackMap v2)

[Philip Reames]

+1 sounds entirely reasonable.

On 07/10/2015 09:47 AM, Juergen Ributzka wrote:
> Sounds good. I will add that to the StackMap documentation when I 
> update it for v2.
>
> —Juergen
>
>> On Jul 10, 2015, at 9:40 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov 
>> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote:
>>
>> No, but I've noticed that it is true in practice, and so I think that 
>> we should say something about it one way or another. Especially 
>> since, in switching to a fixed-size record format, binary searching 
>> now becomes relatively easy/fast. Maybe it would be a useful guarantee?
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Hal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150714/10f126b0/attachment.html>