[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0

[Galina Kistanova]

Ready on my side.

Thanks

Galina



On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote:

> Galina and Takumi,
>
> Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2?
>
> -Chris
>
> On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote:
>
> Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0
> because of Ubuntu's LTS release.
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm with Takumi, and prefer to go on a safe route.
>
>  Takumi, unless I'm missing something you were checking cmake 3.x with
> LLVM.
> How does it look like? Did you discover any problem?
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I missed the context. We may stand on 2.8.12.2 at first.
>>
>> I will update my cmake from 2.8.12.1 to 2.8.12.2 soon.
>>
>> 2015-02-10 7:54 GMT+09:00 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>:
>> > I don't oppose the subject. I will update cmake within a few days.
>> >
>> > 2015-02-10 7:17 GMT+09:00 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>:
>> >> Now, with more Galina and Takumi on the To line. ;-)
>> >>
>> >> ~Aaron
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> +Galina, and Takumi
>> >>>
>> >>> This was a very short lived change :-).
>> >>>
>> >>> Looks like we have some bots that need to be updated.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Chris
>> >>>
>> >>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal build clusters
>> should all
>> >>>> be running 2.8.12.2 or later.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Any OS X users not on CMake 2.8.12.2 can always download install
>> packages
>> >>>> from CMake.org <http://cmake.org/>.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> OK, so its analogous to Windows. SGTM. (and no, I don't think you
>> need to
>> >>> wait for further review of patches)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> >>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>> >>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150220/7b9365bf/attachment.html>