[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?

[Sebastian Redl]

On 2/17/2015 4:39 PM, Aaron Ballman wrote:
> I think we're safe to use it. I've made an experimental commit in
> r229502 to see if any of the bots complain, and will revert if they
> do. Otherwise, I think we're good to go.
>
One specific thing doesn't work: in-class initializers with brace syntax:

class Foo
{
   Bar bar{1, 2, 3};
};

They disabled this due to a silent wrong-code bug.

Sebastian