[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.6 Release] Release Candidate 2 available

Hans Wennborg hans at chromium.org
Fri Feb 6 08:44:42 PST 2015


Sounds reasonable to me if Marshall is okay with it.

Thanks,
Hans

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would really like to get a patch into 3.6 for libc++.  The patch
> renames template parameters with the names '_A' and '_V' to longer
> names. '_A' is frequently defined in ctypes.h and that could cause
> libc++ to not compile.
> I'm fairly sure the code was added between 3.5 and 3.6 so that would
> make this a regression.
>
> The patch can be found here: http://reviews.llvm.org/rL228353. I've
> attached a patch that just modifies the headers and leaves the tests
> alone (the test changes may not merge nicely).
>
> Is this going to be possible?
>
> /Eric
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote:
>>> On 05/02/2015 18:34, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Source and binaries for LLVM 3.6.0-rc2 are now available at
>>>>> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.6.0/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please try them out, run tests, build your favourite projects, and
>>>>> *file bugs* about anything that doesn't work or needs to be fixed for
>>>>> the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Release blockers are tracked by http://llvm.org/PR22374
>>>>
>>> FYI, it builds fine now under HURD & Kfreebsd and the rest of the Debian
>>> archs.
>>
>> Cool!
>>
>>> I landed this patch for HURD:
>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/rL228331
>>>
>>> And waiting for review about lldb on kfreebsd:
>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D7441
>>>
>>> I don't mind if you are not going to take them for 3.6. I am applying
>>> both patches
>>> on top of the package and I don't think many people care...
>>
>> I'm happy to merge if it's non-disruptive and fixes stuff. I've pinged
>> Hal about the first one; let me know how the second one goes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hans
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list