[llvm-dev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9

Philip Reames via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 26 09:46:01 PDT 2015

On 08/26/2015 09:41 AM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org 
> <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote:
>     On 26 August 2015 at 17:39, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com
>     <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     > *shrug* I haven't looked at whatever specific bots are under
>     discussion, but
>     > I really wouldn't mind/would like if the bots had a more "revert
>     to green"
>     > feel to them just like we have for commits: take a bot offline,
>     > fix/iterate/improve it, see if it comes good, then bring it back
>     to the
>     > mainline.
>     One needs a local buildmaster (which I recommend to all bot owners),
>     but might not be trivial.
> I wouldn't mind having a separate official build master (we could have 
> a separate group on the main buildmaster, but I think that's 
> insufficient - the visual noise there is still problematic) that hosts 
> experimental bots.
+1.  I think this would be a very workable solution.

Since we three seem to now be in agreement, do we want to send a top 
level RFC and actually implement this?
>     But I totally agree with this policy. You have my vote. Now, we only
>     have to decide how to make each individual decision as a community.
>     --renato
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150826/6bbedd89/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list