[llvm-dev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9
Philip Reames via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 26 09:46:01 PDT 2015
On 08/26/2015 09:41 AM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org
> <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 17:39, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com
> <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > *shrug* I haven't looked at whatever specific bots are under
> discussion, but
> > I really wouldn't mind/would like if the bots had a more "revert
> to green"
> > feel to them just like we have for commits: take a bot offline,
> > fix/iterate/improve it, see if it comes good, then bring it back
> to the
> > mainline.
> One needs a local buildmaster (which I recommend to all bot owners),
> but might not be trivial.
> I wouldn't mind having a separate official build master (we could have
> a separate group on the main buildmaster, but I think that's
> insufficient - the visual noise there is still problematic) that hosts
> experimental bots.
+1. I think this would be a very workable solution.
Since we three seem to now be in agreement, do we want to send a top
level RFC and actually implement this?
> But I totally agree with this policy. You have my vote. Now, we only
> have to decide how to make each individual decision as a community.
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev