[LLVMdev] More code owners needed

[Tom Stellard]

Hi,

I've been going through my queue of candidate patches for the 3.6 branch,
and I think the process could be smoother if we had more code owners.
So, I'd like to encourage people to nominate themselves or others as
code owners for any part of LLVM that doesn't already have one.

The responsibilities of a code owner include reviewing patches submitted
to llvm-commits and approving merge requests to the stable branches.

To get the ball rolling, I'm going to start nominating new code owners whenever
I get a stable merge request for an unowned component.  I'm going to try to
determine the best code owner based on git history.  If I nominate you, there
is no obligation to accept.  Feel free to decline or nominate someone else.

Thanks,
Tom