[LLVMdev] RFC: Are we ready to completely move away from the optionality of a DataLayout?

Chandler Carruth chandlerc at gmail.com
Sun Oct 19 15:11:58 PDT 2014

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>

> I have a question:
> > 1) Synthesizing a "default" boring DataLayout for all modules that don't
> > specify one.
> What is a default boring value for endianness?

Little. Sorry, but LE won here.

I mean, we could make the default big-endian just to test the less common
scenario, but I think it would just result in bugs in people's test cases
rather than teasing out actual bugs in their code.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141019/4d0eadf1/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list