[LLVMdev] [lld] lld build needs to have flags that specify what flavor/targets to build ?
rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Thu Oct 16 13:49:54 PDT 2014
> I don't think I understand the point. We are free to add a new command line
> option to an existing driver, as long as it doesn't conflict with existing
> ones, to extend the driver. Like most GNU commands did to the Unix
> counterparts. So the statement that we have no control over LLD command line
> doesn't seem correct to me.
Same here. I can see why we need to support N command line option sets
(with N = 3 at the moment), but I never quiet got what the advantage
of having N+1.
More information about the llvm-dev