[LLVMdev] load bytecode from string for jiting problem

WOLFF Willy (ETU MAI) willy.wolff at etu.unistra.fr
Thu Mar 20 15:39:09 PDT 2014


Maybe I found the problem.
For debuging, I modify isEndPos of  BitstreamReader as follows:
original: http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/BitstreamReader_8h_source.html#l00234

  bool isEndPos(size_t pos) {
        if (BitStream == NULL) errs() << "BitStream is null\n";
        else errs() << "BitStream n'est pas null\n";
          errs() << "isEndPos prob " << pos << " & " << BitStream <<"\n";
                StreamableMemoryObject& smo = BitStream->getBitcodeBytes();
        errs() << "isEndPos prob smo\n"; 
        bool m = smo.isObjectEnd(static_cast<uint64_t>(pos));
          errs() << "isEndPos prob " << m << "\n";
          return m;
  }


and on my output i never see "isEndPos prob smo\n";
The segfault occuring when i call getBitcodeBytes().
Also, i don't see the message of "BitStream is null" or "BitStream n'est pas null" ...
Is possible that this variable is not correctly initialized?
 
Thanks
-- 
Willy WOLFF
 
 
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 22:32 CET, Vikas Bhargava <vikasbhargava at gmail.com> wrote: 
 
> Hello Willy,
> Here is the dump from one of my bitcode files:
> 
> 0000000 42 43 c0 de 21 0c 00 00 25 05 00 00 0b 82 20 00
> 
> As expected, 0x42 (= B), 0x43 (= C), xc0 and 0xde are in correct order. In
> your case, the first byte is read as 37 (= 0x25). I wonder why? When you
> check the bytes yourself, you get expected results. When the same bytes are
> read from Stream object, you get a different result (maybe garbage). I
> would suggest that you put a watchpoint on mbjit->getBufferStart() and
> single step your program to make sure it is not freed, over written
> somewhere.
> 
> thx
> Vikas.
> =======
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Willy WOLFF <willy.wolff at etu.unistra.fr>wrote:
> 
> > The stack trace is:
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0  0x00000000004fa8c8 in llvm::BitstreamCursor::Read(unsigned int) ()
> > #1  0x00000000004fa1d2 in llvm::BitcodeReader::
> > ParseBitcodeInto(llvm::Module*) ()
> > #2  0x0000000000503ae9 in llvm::getLazyBitcodeModule(llvm::MemoryBuffer*,
> > llvm::LLVMContext&) ()
> > #3  0x0000000000503eb6 in llvm::parseBitcodeFile(llvm::MemoryBuffer*,
> > llvm::LLVMContext&) ()
> > #4  0x00000000004ec195 in jitter (skeletons=<optimized out>,
> > params=0x7fffffffdf40, phi_state=0x11adbc0, lower=0, upper=250,
> > inst_outer=8, inst_inner=<optimized out>)
> >     at /home/willy/hello_stuff/with_apollo/simple_loop/runtime.cpp:263
> > #5  0x00000000004ec8fa in apollo_runtime_hook (info=<optimized out>,
> > skeletons=0xc8b1f0, skeleton_size=<optimized out>, params=0x7fffffffdf40,
> > phi_state_size=<optimized out>)
> >     at /home/willy/hello_stuff/with_apollo/simple_loop/runtime.cpp:438
> > #6  0x00000000004ee753 in ?? ()
> > #7  0x00000000004ecbf1 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized
> > out>) at /home/willy/hello_stuff/with_apollo/simple_loop/simple_
> > scev_dynamic_array.c:84
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 03/20/2014 10:10 AM, Willy WOLFF wrote:
> >
> >> This segfault occuring only under valgrind,
> >> in shell way, and in gdb way i have
> >>
> >> Invalid bitcode signature
> >> simple_scev_dynamic_array:
> >> /home/willy/apollo/llvm/include/llvm/Support/ErrorOr.h:258: storage_type
> >> *llvm::ErrorOr<llvm::Module *>::getStorage() [T = llvm::Module *]:
> >> Assertion `!HasError && "Cannot get value when an error exists!"' failed.
> >> Command terminated by signal 6
> >>
> >>
> >> this is the code I use:
> >>
> >>
> >> long jitter(void* info, skeleton_pair *skeletons, long skeleton_size,
> >> param_t params, long phi_state_size) {
> >> InitializeNativeTarget();
> >> InitializeNativeTargetAsmPrinter();
> >>
> >> llvm::StringRef sr (skeletons[idx].jit_bytecode,
> >>                                   skeletons[idx].jit_bytecode_length);
> >>
> >>                                 if (sr.str()[0] == 'B')
> >>                                          std::cout << "B ok\n";
> >>                                  if (sr.str()[1] == 'C')
> >>                                          std::cout << "C ok\n";
> >>                                  if (sr.str()[2] == (char) 0xc0)
> >>                                          std::cout << "0xc0 ok\n";
> >>                                  if (sr.str()[3] == (char) 0xde)
> >>                                          std::cout << "0xde ok\n";
> >> llvm::MemoryBuffer* mbjit = llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy (sr);
> >>
> >> llvm::ErrorOr<llvm::Module*> ModuleOrErr = llvm::parseBitcodeFile
> >> (mbjit, context);
> >> if (llvm::error_code EC = ModuleOrErr.getError()) {
> >> std::cout << ModuleOrErr.getError().message() << "\n";
> >> }
> >>
> >> Module* Mjit = ModuleOrErr.get();
> >>
> >> std::string eeError;
> >> ExecutionEngine* nee =
> >> EngineBuilder(Mjit).setEngineKind(EngineKind::JIT).setUseMCJIT(true).
> >> setErrorStr(&eeError).create();
> >> if (!nee) {
> >> fprintf(stderr, "Could not create ExecutionEngine: %s\n",
> >> eeError.c_str());
> >> assert(false);
> >> }
> >>
> >> Function f = ret_fct(Mjit);   // Function* ret_fct (Module*);    return
> >> the function we want to jit.
> >> uint64_t f_ptr = nee->getFunctionAddress(f->getName());
> >>
> >> long (*fjited)(param_t, phi_state_t, long, long, long, long)
> >> = (long (*)(param_t, phi_state_t, long, long, long, long))
> >> (intptr_t)f_ptr;
> >>
> >> returnfjited (params, phi_state, lower, upper, inst_outer, inst_inner);
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> *--*
> >> *Willy WOLFF*
> >>
> >>
> >> On 20 Mar 2014, at 00:37, Vikas Bhargava wrote:
> >>
> >>  segmentation fault indicates memory corruption and it's hard to tell
> >>> without seeing the exact use of the APIs. If possible, please post a
> >>> complete program and gdb stack trace from the core file. If there are
> >>> multiple threads using the global variables, please let us know.
> >>>
> >>> FWIW, I have some tests to write llvm::Module to bitcode files and
> >>> read them back into llvm::Module and they work just fine with 3.4
> >>> (never tried with tip).
> >>>
> >>> thx
> >>> vikas.
> >>> ========
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Willy WOLFF
> >>> <willy.wolff at etu.unistra.fr <mailto:willy.wolff at etu.unistra.fr>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>     all of:
> >>>     ----
> >>>                                     // cout << "lsr: " << lsr << "\n";
> >>>                                     llvm::MemoryBuffer* mbjit =
> >>>
> >>>     llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy (sr);
> >>>     ------
> >>>     string lsr = sr.str();
> >>>                                     // cout << "lsr: " << lsr << "\n";
> >>>                                     llvm::MemoryBuffer* mbjit =
> >>>
> >>>     llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBuffer (lsr);
> >>>     -------
> >>>     string lsr = sr.str();
> >>>                                     // cout << "lsr: " << lsr << "\n";
> >>>                                     llvm::MemoryBuffer* mbjit =
> >>>
> >>>     llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy (lsr);
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     have same result as invalid bit code.
> >>>     The result of valgrind, effectively, i have invalid reads in the
> >>>     parseBitcodeFile:
> >>>
> >>>     ==536== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> >>>     ==536==    at 0x501FE3: llvm::BitstreamCursor::Read(unsigned int)
> >>>     (in /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x501A19:
> >>>     llvm::BitcodeReader::ParseBitcodeInto(llvm::Module*) (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x50AEC8:
> >>>     llvm::getLazyBitcodeModule(llvm::MemoryBuffer*,
> >>>     llvm::LLVMContext&) (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x50B295:
> >>>     llvm::parseBitcodeFile(llvm::MemoryBuffer*, llvm::LLVMContext&)
> >>>     (in /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x4F1231: blah_runtime_hook (runtime.cpp:348)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x4F46C2: ??? (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x4F2B60: main (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==
> >>>     ==536== Invalid read of size 8
> >>>     ==536==    at 0x501FE8: llvm::BitstreamCursor::Read(unsigned int)
> >>>     (in /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x501A19:
> >>>     llvm::BitcodeReader::ParseBitcodeInto(llvm::Module*) (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x50AEC8:
> >>>     llvm::getLazyBitcodeModule(llvm::MemoryBuffer*,
> >>>     llvm::LLVMContext&) (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x50B295:
> >>>     llvm::parseBitcodeFile(llvm::MemoryBuffer*, llvm::LLVMContext&)
> >>>     (in /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x4F1231: blah_runtime_hook (runtime.cpp:348)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x4F46C2: ??? (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x4F2B60: main (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==  Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
> >>>     ==536==
> >>>     ==536==
> >>>     ==536== Process terminating with default action of signal 11
> >>> (SIGSEGV)
> >>>     ==536==  Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
> >>>     ==536==    at 0x501FE8: llvm::BitstreamCursor::Read(unsigned int)
> >>>     (in /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x501A19:
> >>>     llvm::BitcodeReader::ParseBitcodeInto(llvm::Module*) (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x50AEC8:
> >>>     llvm::getLazyBitcodeModule(llvm::MemoryBuffer*,
> >>>     llvm::LLVMContext&) (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x50B295:
> >>>     llvm::parseBitcodeFile(llvm::MemoryBuffer*, llvm::LLVMContext&)
> >>>     (in /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x4F1231: blah_runtime_hook (runtime.cpp:348)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x4F46C2: ??? (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>     ==536==    by 0x4F2B60: main (in
> >>>     /home/willy/blah_test_script/new_blah/simple_scev_dynamic_array)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     *--*
> >>>     *Willy WOLFF*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     On 19 Mar 2014, at 22:11, Vikas Bhargava wrote:
> >>>
> >>>      Hi Willy,
> >>>>     If the disassembly of the module works fine, then there is
> >>>>     nothing wrong with the module.
> >>>>
> >>>>     Stream uses the memorybuffer that you pass in parseBitcodeFile.
> >>>>     If what Will is saying is true, there is something wrong with
> >>>>     your code in "3:", i.e.:
> >>>>
> >>>>     MemoryBuffer* mbjit = MemoryBuffer::getMemBuffer (sr.str());
> >>>>       LLVMContext& context = getGlobalContext();
> >>>>       ErrorOr<Module*> ModuleOrErr = parseBitcodeFile (mbjit, context);
> >>>>       if (error_code EC = ModuleOrErr.getError())
> >>>>       {
> >>>>         std::cout << ModuleOrErr.getError().
> >>>>     message() << "\n";
> >>>>         assert(false);
> >>>>       }
> >>>>
> >>>>     Can you post how you modified it in your second reply? For
> >>>>     debugging purpose, you can simply use
> >>>>     MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy() and not worry about validity of
> >>>>     stringref or null-termination. Also, you can run your program
> >>>>     through valgrind and check for any invalid reads.
> >>>>
> >>>>     HTH
> >>>>     Vikas.
> >>>>     =======
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>     On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Willy WOLFF
> >>>>     <willy.wolff at etu.unistra.fr <mailto:willy.wolff at etu.unistra.fr>>
> >>>>
> >>>>     wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>         I mad the change, and still have the problem.
> >>>>
> >>>>         I investigate more the source code of llvm.
> >>>>
> >>>>         First, I change isRawBitcode function to print the content of
> >>>>         the parameter like this:
> >>>>         original:
> >>>>         http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/__html/ReaderWriter_8h_source._
> >>>> _html#l00081
> >>>>
> >>>>         <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ReaderWriter_8h_source.
> >>>> html#l00081>
> >>>>
> >>>>           inline bool isRawBitcode(const unsigned char *BufPtr,
> >>>>                                    const unsigned char *BufEnd) {
> >>>>             // These bytes sort of have a hidden message, but it's not
> >>>> in
> >>>>             // little-endian this time, and it's a little redundant.
> >>>>                   errs()<< "isRawBitcode output:\n";
> >>>>                   for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> >>>>                           errs() << BufPtr[i] << "\n";
> >>>>                   if (BufPtr != BufEnd )
> >>>>                         errs() << "BP != BE ok\n";
> >>>>                   if (BufPtr[0] == 'B')
> >>>>                         errs() << "B ok\n";
> >>>>                   if (BufPtr[1] == 'C')
> >>>>                         errs() << "C ok\n";
> >>>>                   if (BufPtr[2] ==  0xc0)
> >>>>                         errs() << "0xc0 ok\n";
> >>>>                   if (BufPtr[3] ==  0xde)
> >>>>                         errs() << "0xde ok\n";
> >>>>
> >>>>             return BufPtr != BufEnd &&
> >>>>                    BufPtr[0] == 'B' &&
> >>>>                    BufPtr[1] == 'C' &&
> >>>>                    BufPtr[2] == 0xc0 &&
> >>>>                    BufPtr[3] == 0xde;
> >>>>           }
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         Second, I change ParseBitcodeInto as this:
> >>>>         original:
> >>>>         http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/__html/BitcodeReader_8cpp___
> >>>> source.html#l01971
> >>>>
> >>>>         <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/BitcodeReader_8cpp_
> >>>> source.html#l01971>
> >>>>         ...
> >>>>                 errs() << "parsebitcodeinto sniff the signature\n";
> >>>>                 uint32_t bvar = Stream.Read(8);
> >>>>                                 errs() << "B :" << bvar << "\n";
> >>>>                 if (bvar != 'B') {
> >>>>                         errs() << "B :" << bvar << "\n";
> >>>>                         return Error(InvalidBitcodeSignature)__;
> >>>>
> >>>>                 }
> >>>>
> >>>>                 if (Stream.Read(8) != 'C') {
> >>>>                         errs() << "C\n";
> >>>>                         return Error(InvalidBitcodeSignature)__;
> >>>>
> >>>>                 }
> >>>>                 if (  Stream.Read(8) != 0xc0 ) {
> >>>>                         errs() << "0xc0\n";
> >>>>                         return Error(InvalidBitcodeSignature)__;
> >>>>
> >>>>                 }
> >>>>                 if (  Stream.Read(8) != 0xde ) {
> >>>>                         errs() << "0xde\n";
> >>>>                         return Error(InvalidBitcodeSignature)__;
> >>>>
> >>>>                 }
> >>>>                 // if (Stream.Read(8) != 'B' ||
> >>>>                 //     Stream.Read(8) != 'C' ||
> >>>>                 //     Stream.Read(4) != 0x0 ||
> >>>>                 //     Stream.Read(4) != 0xC ||
> >>>>                 //     Stream.Read(4) != 0xE ||
> >>>>                 //     Stream.Read(4) != 0xD
> >>>>                 //      ) {
> >>>>         ...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         The output of the code is :
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         isRawBitcode output:
> >>>>         B
> >>>>         C
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         BP != BE ok
> >>>>
> >>>>         B ok
> >>>>         C ok
> >>>>         0xc0 ok
> >>>>         0xde ok
> >>>>
> >>>>         parsebitcodeinto sniff the signature
> >>>>         B :37
> >>>>         B :37
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         It's possible that Stream object is not correctly initialized?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         On 03/13/2014 06:37 PM, Will Dietz wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>             On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Willy WOLFF
> >>>>             <willy.wolff at etu.unistra.fr
> >>>>             <mailto:willy.wolff at etu.unistra.fr>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>                 Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>>                 I having a weird problem while writing a bytecode
> >>>>                 module to a string,
> >>>>                 and after read/parse it for unsing on a jit.
> >>>>
> >>>>                 I write a pass to export function to module, and put
> >>>>                 this module inside
> >>>>                 a global variable.
> >>>>                 I use WriteBitcodeToFile for this.
> >>>>                 For debuging, after this write, I try to load the
> >>>>                 exported module with
> >>>>                 parseBitcodeFile.
> >>>>                 This two step works.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>                 After, while the compiled program is running, I try
> >>>>                 to read and parse
> >>>>                 this global variable for jiting the function.
> >>>>
> >>>>                 1) I read the global variable with
> >>>>                    StringRef sr (gv, gv_length);
> >>>>
> >>>>                 2) I manually test this bytecode by
> >>>>                 (inspired by  inline bool isRawBitcode(const unsigned
> >>>>                 char *BufPtr,
> >>>>                 const unsigned char *BufEnd) at
> >>>>                 http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/_
> >>>> _html/ReaderWriter_8h_source.__html#l00067
> >>>>                 <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/
> >>>> html/ReaderWriter_8h_source.html#l00067>)
> >>>>
> >>>>                    if (sr.str()[0] == 'B')
> >>>>                      std::cout << "B ok\n";
> >>>>                    if (sr.str()[1] == 'C')
> >>>>                      std::cout << "C ok\n";
> >>>>                    if (sr.str()[2] == (char) 0xc0)
> >>>>                      std::cout << "0xc0 ok\n";
> >>>>                    if (sr.str()[3] == (char) 0xde)
> >>>>                      std::cout << "0xde ok\n";
> >>>>
> >>>>                 3) I try to parse the gv by
> >>>>                    MemoryBuffer* mbjit = MemoryBuffer::getMemBuffer
> >>>>                 (sr.str());
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>             Not sure if this is your issue, but should be fixed anyway:
> >>>>
> >>>>             The std::string created by "sr.str()" ends its lifetime
> >>>>             in this
> >>>>             statement, and MemoryBuffer for efficiency reasons
> >>>>             avoids copying data it doesn't have to (like StringRef)
> >>>>             so will be
> >>>>             referencing the freed memory.
> >>>>
> >>>>             To resolve this:
> >>>>             * Pass MemoryBuffer your StringRef directly
> >>>>             * Use getMemBufferCopy()
> >>>>             * Preserve the result of sr.str() into a stack variable
> >>>>             and pass that
> >>>>             to getMemoryBuffer() instead.
> >>>>
> >>>>             As a final note, check if your bitcode buffer "string" is
> >>>>             null-terminated or not.  If not, be sure to be careful and
> >>>>             do things like informing MemoryBuffer that this is the case.
> >>>>
> >>>>             Hope this helps,
> >>>>             ~Will
> >>>>
> >>>>                    LLVMContext& context = getGlobalContext();
> >>>>                    ErrorOr<Module*> ModuleOrErr = parseBitcodeFile
> >>>>                 (mbjit, context);
> >>>>                    if (error_code EC = ModuleOrErr.getError())
> >>>>                    {
> >>>>                      std::cout << ModuleOrErr.getError().__message()
> >>>>
> >>>>                 << "\n";
> >>>>                      assert(false);
> >>>>                    }
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>                 This is the execution result:
> >>>>                 B ok
> >>>>                 C ok
> >>>>                 0xc0 ok
> >>>>                 0xde ok
> >>>>                 Invalid bitcode signature
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>                 Ok is not working :/
> >>>>                 But why ???
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>                 For debuging, between 2) and 3), I export the readed
> >>>>                 module and write to
> >>>>                 a file on my hard drive,
> >>>>                 and try llvm-dis, and the dissasembly of the module
> >>>>                 works.
> >>>>
> >>>>                 Wath's wrong? Any idea for solve this problem?
> >>>>
> >>>>                 Thanks you very much.
> >>>>
> >>>>                 Regards,
> >>>>                 Willy
> >>>>                 _________________________________________________
> >>>>                 LLVM Developers mailing list
> >>>>                 LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> >>>>                 http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
> >>>>                 http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/__mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >>>>                 <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
> >>>>
> >>>>         _________________________________________________
> >>>>         LLVM Developers mailing list
> >>>>         LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> >>>>         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
> >>>>         http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/__mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >>>>         <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >>
> >>
 
 



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list