[LLVMdev] Phabricator and private reviews

"C. Bergström" cbergstrom at pathscale.com
Wed Jun 25 11:09:03 PDT 2014


On 06/26/14 12:59 AM, Eric Christopher wrote:
> I don't think it's all patches. I've had plenty of patches go up and
> get reviewed with the reviews going to the list lately.
>
> I'm going to object to this proposal.
Even if it's a subset of patch - is it unreliable review/workflow?
If it's unreliable why object to pausing it?



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list