[LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase II Begins

Tom Stellard tom at stellard.net
Mon Dec 29 13:46:40 PST 2014


On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 02:52:37PM -0500, David Majnemer wrote:
> The most relevant of these is r222856 which reverted a set of broken
> optimizations in r210006.  I'd be happy with just including r222856.

Go ahead and merge this one only.  If there is an -rc3, it will be included.

-Tom

> Optionally, we could take r222868 and r222871 which correctly restore the
> optimization.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hey Tom,
> >
> > David has pointed out to me that we have some *really* bad bugs in
> > instcombine in 3.5 that are starting to seriously impact users.
> > http://llvm.org/PR22050 is a great example. I'm actually surprised LLVM
> > itself doesn't trip over this bug, and I suspect an innocent change to LLVM
> > could result in that.
> >
> > Do you think it's possible to spin a rc3 with a couple more patches to fix
> > this? I think David has already curated the patches and would be willing to
> > ensure they merge cleanly. I'm going to help review them as OK. My hope is
> > that this won't require a huge delay in 3.5.1, but what do you think?
> >
> > -Chandler
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've just tagged 3.5.1-rc2, so testing can begin.  Remember to use the 3.5
> >> branch of the test-suite.  If you have any questions, let me know.
> >>
> >> -Tom
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >>
> >
> >



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list