[LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase II Begins

[Daniel Sanders]

clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz:
    All ok for default options and -mips32.

clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz:
    All ok for default options.
    It will take a couple days to get results for the -mips32 test-suite (there's no FPU or local disk on this machine so some tests take a very long time).

clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross-compiling to Mips):
    All ok for all ISA's more recent than mips32, all ABI's except big-endian N32*, and both endians.

* I seem to have mis-stated the results for rc1 for the big-endian N32 ABI, sorry. It fails 12 tests (previously I stated 'all ok' but looking at those log files again, this was incorrect) and the failing tests seem to involve pointers passed in varargs. This is a regression from 3.5.0 since it used to pass these tests, however this appears to be a small regression that's occurred as result of a major improvement to the big-endian N32 ABI (in particular, cross-linking with GCC now works in general). I therefore think we could leave this as a known issue and make sure it's fixed in 3.6.0 and 3.5.2.
Tom: Do you agree?
________________________________________
From: Daniel Sanders
Sent: 21 December 2014 12:30
To: Hans Wennborg; Tom Stellard
Cc: Ben Pope; Nikola Smiljanic; llvmdev
Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase II Begins

I've uploaded clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz and clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz. The latter fails prune.m in 'make check-all' as it did last time but this is because the 'touch -a' command isn't actually changing the access timestamp.

I've started the test-suite for both of them.
________________________________________
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of Hans Wennborg [hans at chromium.org]
Sent: 19 December 2014 23:50
To: Tom Stellard
Cc: Ben Pope; Nikola Smiljanic; llvmdev
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase II Begins

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just tagged 3.5.1-rc2, so testing can begin.  Remember to use the 3.5
> branch of the test-suite.  If you have any questions, let me know.

I've uploaded the Windows installer to the sftp with sha1:
b56681a457954916ac9c8f0d36426cde0a21ee1d  LLVM-3.5.1-rc2-win32.exe

Build worked fine this time. The only failing lit test is
Modules/compiler_builtins.m, which I guess is PR20995. That's probably
not cause for concern, but maybe we should remove the test from the
branch for those who build from source? CC'ing Yaron who has looked at
the PR some.

 - Hans
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev