[LLVMdev] LIT Verbose
Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com
Fri Dec 19 09:29:20 PST 2014
My understanding was the other way around. The tests timeout but they shouldn't. However, re-reading the original email I see that my mind inserted a word that isn't there.
Renato, just to double check: Is it failing _due_ to timeout? Or failing to timeout?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Roelofs
> Sent: 18 December 2014 22:09
> To: Renato Golin
> Cc: LLVM Dev
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LIT Verbose
> On 12/18/14 2:35 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
> > On 18 December 2014 at 21:32, Jonathan Roelofs
> > <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >> I think this will help one facet of your problem:
> >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D6584
> > I don't think so, because the tests don't time out, it's a buffering issue...
> I gather that the tests don't time out, but you want them to because they're
> taking to long, and whatever you're currently using to do that doesn't work.
> That patch I mentioned causes tests that take too long to be killed, so I still
> think that solves part of your problem.
> OTOH, you observe a buffering issue. Why do you think that gets in the way of
> timeouts killing your tests? ISTM that buffering should be orthogonal to
> timeouts... What are the buildbots currently using to do timeouts?
> > --renato
> Jon Roelofs
> jonathan at codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
More information about the llvm-dev