[LLVMdev] [lld] filename in the atom model.

[Shankar Easwaran]

+ Nick

Rui,

Does PECOFF writer need the filename in the writer as well, I am not 
sure if linker scripts are supported with PECOFF though.

If PECOFF also needs it, I think it makes sense to store the filename in 
the Atom as the native format needs to store that information.

The only option for the ELF writer to know this information is to use 
References if other flavors dont need the filename (only in DEBUG mode, 
clumsy but would work).

PS : Moving this discussion to llvmdev.

Shankar Easwaran

On 12/1/2014 2:34 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote:
> That sounds like we really need a new property of Atom.
>
> 1. If we run LLD in Release build, the roundtrip passes don't run, so
> everything works fine.
> 2. If we run LLD in Debug build (and from the unit tests), the information
> is dropped during the round-trip conversion, and it fails.
> 3. RoundTrip tests should't drop any information.
>
> 2 and 3 conflicts.
>
> I should note that, again, I don't actually like the idea of YAML/Native
> format, though. It feels like it doesn't worth the cost of maintaining two
> more different outputs.
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rui,
>>
>> We discussed to add a new property to the atom, but its really not needed
>> as the original filename from where the atom was parsed is available in
>> release mode(roundtrip passes dont get called in release mode).
>>
>> The discussion was here, http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-
>> November/078910.html.
>>
>> Shankar Easwaran
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation