[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com
Tue Sep 10 02:59:12 PDT 2013
Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11:
In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19:
In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28:
In file included from
error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka
'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >')
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote:
> FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot
> (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that
> does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests under ASan/MSan.
> Probably we can add a couple of steps that would checkout lld and run
> check-lld in ASan-ified/MSan-ified build trees.
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>
>> On 9/8/2013 11:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shankar Easwaran
>>> <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:
>>>> Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with the
>>>> fsanitize options ?
>>>> Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too.
>>> We test it very regularly with all of the sanitizers. We've not been able
>>> to add these bots easily due to infrastructure issues.
>> Thanks for the info Chandler. I would like to add the extra fsanitize
>> configs to the lld buildbot to detect problems early.
>> There have been a bunch of temporary string issues, which would have been
>> easily caught by the sanitizer tools.
>> Shankar Easwaran
>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted
>> by the Linux Foundation
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> Alexey Samsonov, MSK
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
More information about the llvm-dev