[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
shankare at codeaurora.org
Sun Sep 8 21:29:09 PDT 2013
Ubuntu/Debian should work as well, I wanted one flavor where lld could
be built on linux platform.
I will want to have a seperate buildbot to seperate failures if any due
to the fsanitize options.
Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with the
fsanitize options ?
Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too.
On 9/8/2013 10:22 PM, Alex Rosenberg wrote:
> There are existing Darwin and Win7 builders, and a few Debian configs that also build lld. I'd support enabling the sanitizers on these builds as is. Also, tsan especially because lld uses threads.
> If you'd like an Ubuntu bot, somebody is going to have to provide one.
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> Hi All, Chandler,
>> After listening to Chandlers presentation at Going native 2013,
>> I think "lld" should add a buildbot configuration to turn on building lld with -fsanitize options and have buildbot configurations to run on
>> * darwin
>> * linux (ubuntu).
>> I was not really sure on if llvm changes use a buildbot with the -fsanitize options turned on / how stable the llvm libraries are when compiled using those options.
>> Does it make sense to have
>> * llvm built in the normal way
>> * just build lld with the options -fsanitize=address,undefined,memory options ?
>> * build all the sources including lld with the options -fsanitize=address,undefined,memory
>> Has anyone done this experiment already ?
>> Shankar Easwaran
>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation
More information about the llvm-dev