[LLVMdev] Semantics of noalias with vector of pointers?
Matthew.Arsenault at amd.com
Wed Sep 4 15:23:00 PDT 2013
On 09/04/2013 03:16 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:
> Do you actually have a use case for such attributes, or are you just
> trying all possible attributes on all possible types to see what
> breaks? ;-)
I'm mostly just breaking things. I randomly ended up on the bug about
the zext vector parameters and thought it should work.
> It would be theoretically possible to define semantics for
> signext/zerext or even noalias for vectors. However it's not clear
> whether those are really desirable without motivating use cases.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev