[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers

"C. Bergström" cbergstrom at pathscale.com
Wed Nov 6 09:38:14 PST 2013


On 11/ 7/13 12:27 AM, Tim Northover wrote:
>>> If the new feature requires out-of-tree LLVM users to upgrade their
>>> toolchains then we may only be giving them a month or less warning,
>>> even if we are giving downstream packagers 6 months.
>> Correct.  That's not enough warning.
> If we decide to delay this yet again (it's been on the cards since
> January, so I'm personally opposed, but still...) we should at least
> start counting the "acceptable notice" from the start of this thread
> rather than when the dust settles.
because a discussion starts - and the Tea party wants their way.. it 
doesn't mean it's final. I'd love to ignore this thread until something 
is actually announced... with "proper" notice..

// I still don't get the fire everyone is trying to put out...




More information about the llvm-dev mailing list