[LLVMdev] LLVM Loop Vectorizer puzzle

Renato Golin renato.golin at linaro.org
Thu May 23 07:15:29 PDT 2013

On 23 May 2013 14:52, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote:

> I would like us to grow a few annotations, among others, one to force
> vectorization irrespective whether the loop vectorizer thinks it is
> beneficial or not - however, this is future music.

Isn't that part of the ivdep implementation? I thought there was support
for that already...

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130523/213e6e2c/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list