[LLVMdev] Inlining sqrt library function in X86
Benjamin Kramer
benny.kra at gmail.com
Tue May 21 14:14:34 PDT 2013
On 21.05.2013, at 23:03, "Gurd, Preston" <preston.gurd at intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the fix!
>
> However, there still seems to be a problem in that if you pass –ffast-math to clang, then clang changes “sqrt” to be “__sqrt_finite”. LLVM cannot then change the function call into an x86 sqrt instruction, even with –fno-math-errno set.
>
> Can you suggest where I might look in the clang code to find the place where “sqrt” is converted to “__sqrt_finite” and/or the best way to solve this problem?
This sounds like your system headers are trying to outsmart the compiler, clang doesn't generate calls to __sqrt_finite anywhere. We may have to recognize the pattern in LLVM or clang if we want to inline calls to sqrt. A first step would be to figure out where the headers are doing this and whether there's a way to disable it.
- Ben
>
> Thanks,
>
> Preston
>
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf OfChandler Carruth
> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 4:48 PM
> To: Nadav Rotem
> Cc: LLVMdev (LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu)
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Inlining sqrt library function in X86
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote:
> Does fast-math imply no-math-errno ?
>
> Yes, in both GCC and Clang. Clang does have some annoying logic bugs surrounding this flag though. For example, setting -fno-fast-math would imply no-math-errno, overriding the Linux default. Quite weird. I've cleaned this up some and added more clear tests in r182203.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list