[LLVMdev] Feedback required on proper dllexport/import implementation
Yunzhong.Gao at am.sony.com
Wed May 8 13:48:02 PDT 2013
> In this case everything should work fine. If the behavior will be changed,
> then we'll find some subtle bug hiding there for ages. normal dllexport'ed
> functions are essentially external functions with some additional semantics.
> Right. The change should be thoroughly tested. Some fallout from such
> invasive change is a normal thing, really.
Yes, it makes sense.
I think I am now convinced that making an invasive change is not such a scary thing.
> The point here is that patches should come with tests. And this is how we will
> make sure they will work with "new" semantics.
More information about the llvm-dev