[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
aaron at aaronballman.com
Thu Mar 28 12:29:52 PDT 2013
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote:
> Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> writes:
>> In my opinion none of these are irrelevant. Mingw and cygwin are separate
>> ABIs that deal with some C compatibility (problems mentioned in this thread
>> are important here too) and give you the ability to work with low level C
>> libraries on windows, but if you want true compatibility with the full
>> those ABIs are insufficient.
> What do you mean by "the full platform"? Every propietary extension that
> MS came with along all these years? (From structured exceptions to
> whatever Windows RT requires?)
> MinGW is very well capable of using the Win32 API. There is partial or
> non-existent support for extensions such as COM, but those are not part
> of the "ABI", for sure.
COM is not part of the Windows ABI? That's news to me, given that
there are hundreds (thousands?) of powerful APIs exposed *only* via
COM, which are documented and supported by Microsoft. This may or may
not be outside of the realm of the current discussion, but I would
hate to see all the functionality exposed via COM to be tossed aside
with the mistaken belief it's not part of the Windows ecosystem we
need to support.
More information about the llvm-dev