[LLVMdev] Register Class assignment for integer and pointer types

David Chisnall David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk
Sun Jun 23 08:57:44 PDT 2013


Hi,

In our version of LLVM, we've added different-sized iPTR* types, so we have an iPTR256 for our fat pointers.  This causes some problems with constraints, because the way that TableGen resolves constraints is not expected to handle multiple pointer types.  We've added a flag that can be set on a per-backend basis to turn this off.  

Our problem is perhaps a bit different form yours, as our pointers must be loaded and manipulated via special instructions, they can not use the integer instructions or registers.

David

On 23 Jun 2013, at 15:49, 杨勇勇 <triple.yang at gmail.com> wrote:

> David, thanks for your immediate response.
> 
> Since iPTR is a reserved type for tablegen internal use, can you make a further explanation?
> 
> On the other hand, it can be simply treated as a register class assignment problem during register allocation.
> Assume both pointer and integet have a 32 bit width. backend handles it just as to i32. When it performs register allocation, it can retrieve from target constraint information about which register class is valid for a operand, and this is determined by which instruction consumes the operand.
> 
> So is there a convienient way to constrain register class assignment, like a tablegen interface or something else?
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 2013/6/21 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>
> We also have this problem, and have added iPTR types to the back end.  Our pointers are actually fat pointers, so this also requires tweaking some optimisations (for example, things like to turn GEPs with 64-bit offsets into pointer-sized offsets, but our pointers are larger than any integer type that we support...).  Most of the changes are a bit ugly, and I'm loath to upstream them without an in-tree target that has these requirements, or they will be hard for anyone else to keep working.
> 
> David
> 
> On 21 Jun 2013, at 06:00, 杨勇勇 <triple.yang at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > llvm code generator lowers both integer and pointer types into ixx(say, i16, i32, i64, ...). This make senses for some optimizations.
> >
> > However, integer registers and pointer registers is expilicitly distinguished from each other for some architectures, like TriCore, Blackfin, and our lab prototype dsp, which accelerates address computation and memory access.
> >
> > I have already read this mail thread: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-May/022142.html , and I am wondering how is the progress about it.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > 杨勇勇 (Yang Yong-Yong)
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 杨勇勇 (Yang Yong-Yong)





More information about the llvm-dev mailing list