[LLVMdev] [PATCH v2] X86: disambiguate unqualified btr, bts

James Courtier-Dutton james.dutton at gmail.com
Wed Jul 17 00:54:34 PDT 2013

On Jul 17, 2013 7:41 AM, "Joerg Sonnenberger" <joerg at britannica.bec.de>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:54:21AM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> > Jim Grosbach wrote:
> > > No. The above rule is absolutely the wrong thing to do, as has been
> > > previously noted.
> >
> > I don't give a shit about whether you think it is "absolutely wrong"
> > or not; I did what hpa and the Intel manual outlined.  If you have
> > some _reason_ not to do that, bring it up.
> In case you have missed this, this is not LKML. Please keep your abusive
> language at home. Linus and hpa are no almighty authorities here and
> this is not the Linux kernel community.

Linus is an expert on the x86 instruction set, so his advice on what to do
with bts and btc should be taken seriously. So i thing that although Linus
is not an LLVM authority, he should be considered an x86 authority.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130717/e08cc207/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list