[LLVMdev] [PATCH] parallel loop awareness to the LoopVectorizer

[Redmond, Paul]

Sounds better!

On 2013-01-28, at 2:34 PM, Pekka Jääskeläinen wrote:

> On 01/28/2013 09:23 PM, Redmond, Paul wrote:
>> If ivdep are the semantics you're going for I'd use that.
> 
> Fine, except I prefer not to include 'v' in it. Vectorization
> is merely a one way to parallelize the loop.
> 
> How does llvm.loop.ignore_assumed_deps sound?
> 
> -- 
> --Pekka
>