[LLVMdev] [PATCH] parallel loop awareness to the LoopVectorizer

Pekka Jääskeläinen pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi
Mon Jan 28 11:34:25 PST 2013

On 01/28/2013 09:23 PM, Redmond, Paul wrote:
> If ivdep are the semantics you're going for I'd use that.

Fine, except I prefer not to include 'v' in it. Vectorization
is merely a one way to parallelize the loop.

How does llvm.loop.ignore_assumed_deps sound?


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list