[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
root at 32bitmicro.com
Fri Jan 11 12:47:01 PST 2013
On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote:
>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski
>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer
>>> <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, ????????? (Wei-Ren Chen)
>>> <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote:
>>>> Hi Pawel,
>>>> PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory
>>>> still sit in lib/Target in 3.2 release. Do you think update
>>>> the release tarball is a good idea? Also could you remove it
>>>> from the trunk?
>>> Please do not, under no circumstances, change the 3.2 release
>>> tarballs at this point. They are mirrored around the world now
>>> with cryptographic hashes and signatures. Changing them will
>>> break things for many people, especially for an extremely
>>> minor thing like an empty directory.
>>> I'm not sure if Pawel's tarball change should be reverted now
>>> as it already caused uproar, so changing it back might only
>>> make matters worse.
>>> The tarballs were changed?
> I finally updated the FreeBSD ports yesterday and today a user
> complained about distfile changes. IMO, this revision should be
> reverted or all the other BSDs will have to chase checksums as
> If you really want to remove the directory, ship a 3.2.1 tarball
> rather than screwing all the downstream consumers who's
> infrastructure exists to detect trojan'd tarballs.
Tarball is signed, it is not trjoan.
Your infrastructure should be able to deal with it?
> -- Brooks
More information about the llvm-dev