[LLVMdev] ARM vectorizer cost model

Renato Golin Linaro renato.golin at linaro.org
Fri Jan 11 09:49:13 PST 2013

On 11 January 2013 17:06, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote:

> Yes. I am expecting something similar.
> > That also means we should re-using the X86TypeConversionCostTblEntry as
> a more generic structure?
> Yes, it would be nice to generalize it. Maybe we can even unify the
> two-operand and one-operand tables into a single structure.

Great, I'll have a look!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130111/106fcb34/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list