[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LTO "bug" and Clang warnings

Renato Golin renato.golin at linaro.org
Tue Jan 8 11:20:59 PST 2013

On 8 January 2013 19:15, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

> That's the fun of it - all the things that aren't defined are
> undefined. (but, yes, some things are more explicitly undefined than
> others)

This is Java is much better, there's no standard, just Oracle's
implementation! :D

No, it's built into clang itself, actually. clang -analysis or
> somesuch, I've not run it myself, actually.
> http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/ should have some details.

Not much comes out of it when I pass it over lto-test.c:

<plist version="1.0">
<string>clang version 3.3 </string>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130108/d6c779ab/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list