[LLVMdev] TableGen patterns with multiple outputs
bob.wilson at apple.com
Sun Jan 6 20:08:58 PST 2013
It has been something we've talked about for years, but I'm not aware of anyone working on it right now.
On Jan 6, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Is this on someone's list of things to do?
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2013, at 9:52 AM, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Are multi-output patterns in TableGen supposed to work, or is that a known limitation in the current implementation?
> It is a known limitation. You have to write C++ code to match patterns with multiple outputs.
>> If I have TableGen code like the following...
>> 1242 def SDTTestNode : SDTypeProfile<2, 1, [SDTCisSameAs<0, 1>]>;
>> 1243 def TestNode : SDNode<"NVPTXISD::TestNode", SDTTestNode>;
>> 1245 def MyTestNode : NVPTXInst<(outs Int32Regs:$dst0, Int32Regs:$dst1),
>> 1246 (ins Int32Regs:$a),
>> 1247 "test $dst0, $dst1, $a;",
>> 1248 [(set Int32Regs:$dst0, Int32Regs:$dst1, (TestNode Int32Regs:$a))]>;
>> ... TableGen crashes with the following stack trace:
>> #0 0x00007fff8f372212 in __pthread_kill ()
>> #1 0x00007fff8dc0eaf4 in pthread_kill ()
>> #2 0x00000001003a978b in raise (sig=6) at Signals.inc:345
>> #3 0x00000001003a9842 in abort () at Signals.inc:362
>> #4 0x00000001003a9821 in __assert_rtn (func=0x1003d0d14 "operator", file=0x1003b169e "/Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h", line=139, expr=0x1003b16e7 "begin() + idx < end()") at Signals.inc:358
>> #5 0x00000001000ca394 in llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::EEVT::TypeSet, void>::operator (this=0x10384fed0, idx=1) at SmallVector.h:139
>> #6 0x00000001000c965b in llvm::TreePatternNode::getExtType (this=0x10384fed0, ResNo=1) at CodeGenDAGPatterns.h:349
>> #7 0x00000001000bd615 in llvm::CodeGenDAGPatterns::ParseInstructions (this=0x7fff5fbff0b0) at /Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/utils/TableGen/CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp:2782
>> #8 0x00000001000b7143 in llvm::CodeGenDAGPatterns::CodeGenDAGPatterns (this=0x7fff5fbff0b0, R=@0x7fff5fbff670) at /Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/utils/TableGen/CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp:2077
>> #9 0x00000001000b6a3d in llvm::CodeGenDAGPatterns::CodeGenDAGPatterns (this=0x7fff5fbff0b0, R=@0x7fff5fbff670) at /Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/utils/TableGen/CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp:2091
>> #10 0x000000010024cd15 in InstrInfoEmitter (this=0x7fff5fbff0a8, R=@0x7fff5fbff670) at /Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/utils/TableGen/InstrInfoEmitter.cpp:39
>> #11 0x0000000100248e8d in InstrInfoEmitter (this=0x7fff5fbff0a8, R=@0x7fff5fbff670) at /Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/utils/TableGen/InstrInfoEmitter.cpp:39
>> #12 0x0000000100248e36 in llvm::EmitInstrInfo (RK=@0x7fff5fbff670, OS=@0x7fff5fbff518) at /Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/utils/TableGen/InstrInfoEmitter.cpp:420
>> #13 0x00000001002d0930 in LLVMTableGenMain (OS=@0x7fff5fbff518, Records=@0x7fff5fbff670) at /Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/utils/TableGen/TableGen.cpp:106
>> #14 0x00000001002e8385 in llvm::TableGenMain (argv0=0x7fff5fbffa88 "/Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/build/bin/llvm-tblgen", MainFn=0x1002d0880 <LLVMTableGenMain>) at /Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/lib/TableGen/Main.cpp:117
>> #15 0x00000001002d0864 in main (argc=11, argv=0x7fff5fbff8f8) at /Users/jholewinski/projects/llvm/src/llvm/utils/TableGen/TableGen.cpp:181
>> The fault occurs in CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp:
>> 2781 for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumResults; ++i)
>> 2782 ResultPattern->setType(i, Res0Node->getExtType(i));
>> Res0Node has only 1 type, but it is expected to have 2.
>> Looking at the X86 back-end code, it looks like there do exist multi-output instructions, but they all use physical (implicit) registers for the second destination, not arbitrary register types. And if I change the second destination to be a certain physical register, this problem goes away in my code. Is this just not a supported case currently? Or am I doing something wrong?
>> This is my first time looking into the TableGen internals, so I can't spot anything obviously wrong with the TableGen tool code.
>> Justin Holewinski
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev