[LLVMdev] running clang format on the Mips target

[David Chisnall]

As someone with an  lot of out-of-tree changes to the MIPS back end, I would consider this to be somewhat impolite.  I hope to upstream the changes that are relevant to users of other MIPS-derived processors in the new year, and having large numbers of formatting changes would make rebasing a lot more painful.

David

On 20 Dec 2013, at 20:52, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:

> We are considering running clang format on the whole Mips target.
> 
> Is there any rule against this?
> 
> Is there any good argument against doing this even if there is no rule against it?
> 
> TIA.
> 
> Reed
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev