[LLVMdev] Add a new llvm intrinsic?

[Jeffrey Yasskin]

This sounds a lot like the question at
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-July/064462.html. It
sounds like you have a pointer marked 'restrict', but it's actually
aliased in another thread. That would be undefined behavior even with
a stronger fence.

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Guo, Xiaoyi <Xiaoyi.Guo at amd.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In OpenCL, the "barrier()" function, as well as various target specific memory fence intrinsics, should prevent loads/stores of the relevant address space from being moved across them.
> Kernel pointers with "restrict" attributes are implemented by marking the pointer "noalias" in the LLVMIR. However, in LLVM, "noalias" pointers are not affected by llvm memory fence instructions.
>
> To make sure all loads/stores, including those accessing "restrict" pointers are not moved across the barrier/fence intrinsics, we have considered using customized alias analysis passes. However, we would like to move away from using customized passes and would like to use standard llvm mechanisms as much as possible.
>
> What do people think about adding an llvm intrinsic, something like llvm.opencl.mem_fence(i32) (or named something that doesn't have opencl in the name, llvm.addrspace_fence?), which acts as a fence for a single given address space (assuming again that there's no problem with implementing these things as a series of different functions to get the full effect), and which prevents even noalias pointers from being moved across it?
>
> Alternatively (possibly nicer) would be something that looks like the memset intrinsic, which can work for any address space.
> llvm.addrspace_fence.p1.p2(void)
> llvm.addrspace_fence.p1(void) ...
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaoyi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev