[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!

[Renato Golin]

On 24 April 2013 12:42, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote:

>   Nothing special so far. From my experience, Panda would be good for
> testing, but I don't know how good Beagle is (how much time it takes
> for compilation and testing run?). I would like to have multiple Panda
> if possible (not one Beagle, and one Panda). IMO, that makes testing
> enviroment simpler.
>

Beagles are far slower than Pandas (not just because they have A8 in them,
but less memory and other bits). I'd also like to have multiple boards of
the same type in parallel, but reality is hitting hard at the bottom.

Me and Sylvestre are trying to get the most out of the hardware we have and
we should have a good enough set of boards/tests to get good coverage. Of
course, if you can find more hardware elsewhere, feel free to add in the
bundle, so we don't do redundant tests.

cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130424/ca31c839/attachment.html>