[LLVMdev] LNT ClamAV - Sorting output

Sean Silva silvas at purdue.edu
Fri Apr 19 13:41:16 PDT 2013


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote:

> On 19 April 2013 17:48, Török Edwin <edwin at etorok.net> wrote:
>
>> Otherwise what might seem like a 20% improvement
>> could very well be just a 0.2% improvement in practice.
>>
>
> This is (maybe to a lesser extent) what happens with most of our
> benchmarks, and running them 3 times doesn't add that much confidence but
> makes it run much slower. I end up treating the test-suite as functionality
> and correctness test, rather than useful benchmark data.
>
> I agree it would be great to have a decent benchmark infrastructure for
> LLVM, but I'm not sure the test-suite is the appropriate place. Maybe a
> different type of run that crank the inputs up to 11 and let the
> applications run for longer, to be run once a week or so wouldn't be a bad
> idea, though.
>
>
A simple benchmark that we run "all the time" is how long it takes for us
to compile ourselves. Do we track this?

-- Sean Silva
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130419/7128f0a0/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list