[LLVMdev] Go Programming & LLVM/Clang
David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk
Thu Sep 27 03:43:32 PDT 2012
On 27 Sep 2012, at 11:37, Duncan Sands wrote:
> If I were you I would stick with gcc for now.
Unless you're in one of the situations where gcc performs better and you actually really care about performance, I'd recommend using 6g instead of gcc for Go. It's easier to set up and use, smaller, and is the reference implementation. It's in FreeBSD ports as lang/go.
More information about the llvm-dev