[LLVMdev] teaching FileCheck to handle variations in order
kparzysz at codeaurora.org
Fri Sep 14 09:15:32 PDT 2012
On 9/13/2012 4:49 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> I mean, it's inconvenient, mostly for the person changing the scheduler,
> but provided there are helpful comments for them, I suspect they're not
> going to have a hard time updating the test cases.
Why would they have to do that in the first place? Like I said, tests
should not be checking things that they were not specifically meant to
test. Hard time or not, I don't think anyone would be excited about
having to go through a list of potential false positives.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the llvm-dev