[LLVMdev] dead store elimination with external functions

Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at codeaurora.org
Wed Sep 12 11:11:26 PDT 2012

On 9/12/2012 12:57 PM, Peng Cheng wrote:
> Maybe I should say b2 should be eliminated.
> [...] b1 is not used any more after the function call,

That cannot be proven.  The address in b1 may have escaped.


Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, 
hosted by The Linux Foundation

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list