[LLVMdev] 64 bit special purpose registers
Ivan Llopard
ivanllopard at gmail.com
Thu Sep 6 05:06:08 PDT 2012
Hi Akira, Micah,
On 05/09/2012 21:44, Akira Hatanaka wrote:
> Micah,
>
> Do you mean we should make GPR64 available to register allocator by
> calling addRegisterClass?
>
> addRegisterClass(MVT::i64, &GPR64RegClass)
I have a related question to this thread. Does the RA use target
lowering information?
Because if it doesn't, you don't need to register your i64 reg class.
Ivan
>
> If we add register class GPR64, type legalization will stop expanding
> i64 operations because i64 is now a legal type.
> Then we will probably have to write lots of code to custom-lower
> unsupported 64-bit operations during legalization. Note that mips32/16
> lacks support for most of the basic 64-bit instructions (add, sub, etc.).
>
> I don't think setting operation action by calling
> setOperationAction(... ,MVT::i64, Expand) would work either. Judging
> from the code I see in Legalize.cpp, operation legalization doesn't
> seem to do much to expand unsupported i64 operations.
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com
> <mailto:Micah.Villmow at amd.com>> wrote:
>
> This can be done by declaring a register class with these
> registers and only using that register class as an operand in the
> instructions where it is legal.
> You then set as sub registers what you want to represent as the hi
> and lo registers for those 64bit registers.
>
> So something like this:
> def lo_comp : SubRegIndex;
> def hi_comp : SubRegIndex;
> def R1 : Register<1>;
> def R2 : Register<2>;
> def R3 : Register<1>;
> def R4 : Register<2>;
> def D1 : RegisterWithSubRegs<1, [R1, R2], [lo_comp, hi_comp]>;
>
> This says that D1 is a register with two components, lo and hi.
> When you allocate D1, you also use R1/R2.
> def GPR32 : RegisterClass<..., [i32], [32], (add (sequence "R%u",
> 1, 4))> ...
> def GPR64 : RegisterClass<..., [i64], [64], (add D1)> ...;
>
> So in your instruction it would be something like:
> def mul : Inst<(dst GPR64:$dst), (src GPR32:$src0, GPR32:$src1), ...>;
>
> This would mean you take in two inputs and you have 64bit output.
> When D1 is not being used, R1/R2 will get allocated to
> instructions that use GPR32 register class, otherwise they will be
> seen as used and not get allocated.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Micah
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
> <mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu>
> [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
> <mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu>]
> > On Behalf Of reed kotler
> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 4:52 PM
> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> > Subject: [LLVMdev] 64 bit special purpose registers
> >
> > On Mips 32 there is traditionally a 64 bit HI/LO register for
> the result
> > of multiplying two 64 bit numbers.
> >
> > There are corresponding instructions to load the LO and HI parts
> into
> > individual 32 registers.
> >
> > On Mips with the DSP ASE (an application specific extension),
> there are
> > actual 4 such pairs of registers.
> >
> > Is there a way to have special purpose 64 bit registers without
> actually
> > having to tell LLVM that you have a 64 bit processor?
> >
> > But it's still possible to use the individual parts of the 64
> register
> > as temporaries.
> >
> > The only true 64 bit operation is multiplying two 32 bit numbers.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120906/ff2c2770/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list