[LLVMdev] Status of YAML IO?
shankare at codeaurora.org
Tue Oct 30 19:53:03 PDT 2012
> Can you be more specific in your proposal. What method(s) would you add to the the Atom class(es)? I thought you were thinking of a generic uint32_t DefinedAtom::flags() method where the meaning of each bit in the uint32_t returned was platform specific. How can that work with a min/max range?
The range of flags would be integers ranging from LOW_PROC .. HIGH_PROC.
The Generic flags would be within the range less than LOW_PROC and
greater HIGH_PROC. Any value within the range LOW_PROC .. HIGH_PROC is
What I was thinking was there could be a uint32_t flags() in the
definedAtom which returns the flags, and platforms can act accordingly
on the meaning of the flags in their pieces of code.
What do you think ?
More information about the llvm-dev