[LLVMdev] [RFC] Extend LLVM IR to express "fast-math" at a per-instruction level

Eli Friedman eli.friedman at gmail.com
Mon Oct 29 17:30:44 PDT 2012

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek
<kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 6:34 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote:
>>    N: no NaNs - ignore the existence of NaNs when convenient
> Maybe distinguish between quiet and signaling NaNs?

We already ignore the existence of signaling NaNs by default.  The
proposal could make that more clear, though.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list