[LLVMdev] Poll: LLVM test-suite project usage

[Nadav Rotem]

Yes,  I use the test-suite (TEST.simple) as a check-in criteria on anything non trivial.

On Oct 25, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to get some feedback on who in the community is using the
> LLVM test-suite repository, and in what ways.
> 
> I am talking specifically about the "test-suite" SVN project, e.g.:
>  http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk/
> not about the "test (no-dash) suite" that is part of LLVM.
> 
> If you are using the LLVM test-suite project directly (as opposed to
> via LNT), I'd appreciate it if you could reply to me personally with
> the following information:
> 
> 1. What facilities of the project do you use:
> [ ] User defined test functionality
> [ ] Ability to execute two compilers (baseline, modified)
> [X] Ability to use Makefile's to modify and rerun small parts of tests

	I run 'make' in sub directories to parts of the build.

> [ ] Test suite ability to work with LLVM bit code files and tools (as
> opposed to native object files)
> [X ] Ability to test SPEC
 Yes.
> [ ] Ability to execute tests on a remote target
> [ ] Ability to test Fortran codes
> 
> 2. What compilers do you use the project to test:
> [ X] clang
> [ ] llvm-gcc
> [ ] dragonegg
> [ ] Other LLVM compilers (?)
> [ ] Other non-LLVM compilers
> 
Just Clang.

> 3. What TEST variants do you use:
> [ ] I do not know what this means
> [ ] nightly
> [x ] simple
> [ ] Other, please specify: _________
> 
Just Simple.

> - Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev