[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH/RFC, PowerPC] Extend 32-bit function arguments / return values
Ulrich.Weigand at de.ibm.com
Tue Oct 23 07:52:16 PDT 2012
Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote on 23.10.2012 15:54:47:
> > Well, I guess the "exact triple" would specify Intel, right? In which
> > case the IR wouldn't really have to change ...
> > However, this would mean a whole bunch of test cases either wouldn't
> > be executed at all on non-Intel platforms, or else we'd have to have
> > (near-)duplicates of the tests for different platforms. Neither option
> > looks really desirable to me.
> There are not that many tests and they are not very platform
> dependent, so I don't thing you are losing too much by adding a triple
> to them.
Well, fine with me. I can prepare a patch to add the triple.
Which triple would you suggest to use for this?
(I don't have Darwin systems to test on myself. I could test either of
the latter on Linux/Intel ...)
More information about the llvm-dev