[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews

Renato Golin rengolin at systemcall.org
Sat Oct 20 10:20:09 PDT 2012

On 20 October 2012 09:56, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> I don't think the account creation or login mechanism (something that
> is ancillary at best to a code review system) should be the primary
> feature or constraint considered. Instead, with a workable (if
> awkward) solution in hand, let's perhaps focus on whether the tool is
> useful in actually doing code reviews.

I'm with Chandler here. It's not like they're going to start sharing
your details with spammers, is it? (is it?)

If the tool works and we're all happy, we can then setup a better
infrastructure around it (and move out of Chandler's server, etc).



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list