[LLVMdev] code-owner sporks

Chris Lattner clattner at apple.com
Fri Nov 16 10:15:56 PST 2012

On Nov 16, 2012, at 9:56 AM, dag at cray.com wrote:
>> Ping at appropriate time intervals (~3 days is sane); 
> 3 days is *not* sane.  The fact that we require pings at all indicates a
> broken process.  I don't understand why there is such resistance to a
> patch queue.  I don't even care about the revision control system as
> much as I do about a managed patch system.  We have a system for bugs,
> which are _much_ less frequent occurrences than patches.
> I can't stall my work for 3 days waiting for someone not to see my
> patch.

David, I can understand your position here, but I don't see *you* reviewing any patches.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list