[LLVMdev] [DragonEgg] Why Fortran's "call flush()" is converted to "call void bitcast (void (...)* @_gfortran_flush_i4 to void (i8*)*)(i8* null) nounwind" ?

Dmitry N. Mikushin maemarcus at gmail.com
Tue Jul 17 05:10:14 PDT 2012


Duncan,

Oh, right, now I remember: it's a very old problem I knew 1.5 years ago.
There were even some bugs on it, here is a common case:

> cat test1.f90
program test

  call test1()

end program test

> kernelgen-dragonegg test1.f90 -o- | opt -O3 -S -o -
; ModuleID = '<stdin>'
target datalayout =
"e-p:64:64:64-S128-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f16:16:16-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-f128:128:128-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"

@options.0.1537 = internal constant [8 x i32] [i32 68, i32 511, i32 0, i32
0, i32 0, i32 1, i32 0, i32 1], align 32

declare void @test1_(...)

define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) nounwind uwtable {
entry:
  tail call void @_gfortran_set_args(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) nounwind
  tail call void @_gfortran_set_options(i32 8, i32* getelementptr inbounds
([8 x i32]* @options.0.1537, i64 0, i64 0)) nounwind
  tail call void bitcast (void (...)* @test1_ to void ()*)() nounwind
  ret i32 0
}

declare void @_gfortran_set_args(i32, i8**)

declare void @_gfortran_set_options(i32, i32*)


So every external function call, not only flush, in DragonEgg is declared
varargs and called with a bitcast. This is really really big problem in our
case, because:

1) We need to convert calls to external functions to FFI invocation, i.e.
catch all CallInsts-s, get function name, args' values and types. I don't
know how to deal with CallInst-s that have bitcasts.
2) We can't have any varargs function defined in module, because it is
operated by NVPTX, varargs are not allowed there.

How do you think what would be the best way to workaround this problem, if
it seems to be not in focus for anybody for now?

Thanks,
- D.

2012/7/17 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>

> Hi Dmitry,
>
>
>  Do you think this is a system problem of gcc applicable to other
>> functions too, or just a flush-specific bug?
>>
>
> it has nothing to do with flush - for all I know flush is fine.  Dragonegg
> does this for all Fortran functions because the Fortran front-end is so
> buggy,
> i.e. often produces wrong function types.  I have another way of handling
> this
> in mind, which would avoid this trick, but I didn't get round to
> implementing
> it yet.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
>
>
>
>> Best,
>> - Dima.
>>
>> ----- Original message -----
>>
>>> On 17/07/12 08:22, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dmitry,
>>>>
>>>>  This is probably a question for Fortran/DragonEGG experts:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why Fortran's "call flush()" is converted to "call void bitcast
>>>>> (void (...)* @_gfortran_flush_i4 to void (i8*)*)(i8* null) nounwind"
>>>>> ? Why it needs bitcast?
>>>>>
>>>> Just a wild guess (basing from my llvm-gcc knwoledge though): there is
>>>> a bug with in gcc fortran frontend where it fails to create the
>>>> function TREEs with proper types. It might easily be possible that
>>>> e.g. call of function with type with no args is performed with some
>>>> amount of args, etc. It's pretty fine in gcc, but not in LLVM, the
>>>> latter is much more strict wrt this.
>>>>
>>>> The only solution / workaround for this was to emit the function
>>>> definition as variadic and do bitcast at a call site (there are some
>>>> other fortran-specific stuff involved here, e.g dummy args)...
>>>>
>>>> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/**show_bug.cgi?id=33097<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33097>for more info.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes, this is the reason.
>>>
>>> Ciao, Duncan.
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu                 http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/**mailman/listinfo/llvmdev<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120717/ad07d51a/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list