[LLVMdev] [RFC] Remat Enhancements
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
stoklund at 2pi.dk
Mon Feb 27 09:55:41 PST 2012
On Feb 27, 2012, at 9:51 AM, David A. Greene wrote:
> dag at cray.com (David A. Greene) writes:
>>>> The change requires that live interval analysis be able to determine
>>>> whether and instruction is a load and whether an instruction writes to
>>> Just use MI->mayLoad(), MI->mayStore().
>> Does this also account for arithmetic instructions with memops? These
>> interfaces didn't exist in 2.9.
> This is important because if mayLoad includes arithmetic instructions
> with source memops (which I assume it will), it is unsuitable for remat
> analysis. I don't think we want to remat general arithmetic quite yet.
> At least that's not the intent of my change. I'll need some way to
> identify "real" loads and I don't know of any other way other than
> listing opcodes. Ideas?
The target sets the isRematerializable bit on opcodes that are suitable for remat. That should be sufficient.
You should also check the 'canFoldAsLoad' mechanism.
More information about the llvm-dev