[LLVMdev] We need better hashing

Chris Lattner clattner at apple.com
Sat Feb 18 18:28:02 PST 2012

On Feb 18, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> My advise is to check in when you have to make forward progress.  If people want to reshave your yak into another hairdo, then then can do that at some later time.  No reason to block your progress as long as the API is good.
> I was trying to give feedback on the API, and specifically suggest an alternative that might be both easier to use, and naturally dovetail with an upcoming standard. =/ Is there no interest in this? I'm happy to contribute an implementation using this API (we'll need to implement it anyways), but I'm actually not interested in just shaving yaks. I'm interested in getting a really good API here, because this is the support library that is usually held to a very high bar for APIs...

Which API?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120218/b8cd6612/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list